Cycle to Work Scheme Alert: Act Now before the Budget.
- Run & Ride
- 2 days ago
- 3 min read
Rumours are swirling that the UK Government is planning to cap the Cycle to Work scheme at £1,000 in the upcoming Autumn Budget (November 26th).
This proposed change aims to curb the scheme's rising cost to the Treasury and address criticisms that it disproportionately benefits higher earners. But what does this mean for the scheme's future, its users, and the cycling industry?
The Proposed Cap: A Return to £1,000
The original £1,000 cap was removed in 2019 to accommodate the growing popularity and necessity of e-bikes and cargo bikes. The current proposal would reinstate this limit, driven by concerns that the scheme now subsidies "luxury leisure" for "high earners" rather than essential commuting. The scheme's cost has jumped from £55 million to an estimated £130 million, making it an easy target for government spending cuts.
The Impact: Who Wins, Who Loses?
1. The Scheme Itself: A £1,000 cap would drastically limit the types of bikes accessible, particularly quality e-bikes (which often start at £2,500+). This fundamentally undermines its potential for longer commutes, directly conflicting with broader environmental and active travel goals.
2. Cyclists:
Minimal Impact for Basic Bikes: If you're looking for an entry-level hybrid, you might not notice much difference.
Major Setback for E-bike & Premium Buyers: For those needing a more expensive bike, the scheme effectively becomes unviable. You'd lose significant tax and National Insurance savings, making the purchase far more expensive. The current economic climate, with rising import costs and inflation, further diminishes any hope of retailers dropping prices to compensate.
3. Bicycle Retailers: The timing is tough for an industry already navigating a post-pandemic slowdown. Retailers, especially independent shops, rely heavily on the scheme for sales of higher-value bikes. A cap would severely dampen demand in this segment, squeezing margins and potentially leading to significant financial pressure across the industry. While some might hope less demand would bring prices down, the reality is that high manufacturing costs and existing economic pressures make widespread, sustainable price cuts unlikely, particularly for e-bikes.
Is Reform Overdue? The Equity Debate
The central argument for reform hinges on the scheme's equity. It's often criticised for disproportionately benefiting higher earners who, due to their higher tax bracket, receive a larger percentage saving (up to 42% vs. 32% for basic rate taxpayers). This has led to the perception that the scheme subsidises expensive bikes for those who need the financial help the least, moving away from its original intent of encouraging basic commuting for all. Critics argue that the rising cost to the Treasury could be better allocated elsewhere if the goal is truly equitable access to active travel.
Should You Rush?
Yes, if... you're planning a higher-value bike purchase. If your employer's scheme currently allows for certificates above the rumoured £1,000 cap, securing your certificate before the Autumn Budget on November 26th could lock in your purchase under the existing, uncapped rules. Tax changes can often take effect immediately, so waiting could mean missing out on substantial savings.
The Bigger Picture
While calls for reform have merit regarding equity, a blunt £1,000 cap risks throwing the baby out with the bathwater. It threatens to dismantle a vital incentive for sustainable transport, particularly for e-bikes, which are crucial for overcoming barriers to cycling for a broader demographic. The question remains: will the government find a way to make the scheme more equitable without putting the brakes on active travel ambitions?
Disclaimer: here at Run & Ride we are always keen to help our customers wherever we can. However, as with most things there are financial limits and as a result we have to operate in such a way as: Discounted bikes are only permitted for Cycle to Work related schemes when the provider commission is added back on to the overall purchase price (yes, scheme providers do get paid and it's the retailer that pays them, eating into already tight margins). This can be anything from 10-15% depending on your scheme provider.
Comments